View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
xnappo Expert
Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 861
|
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Robman wrote: | I have added a map and an image to the RDF zip file, but they don't work in RM. I can't see anything wrong with the RDF, so someone else will need to tell us why RM blows up when you try to use this RDF. |
I will take a look this evening.
Have you run it through Vicki's checker tool?
xnappo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vickyg2003 Site Admin
Joined: 20 Mar 2004 Posts: 7073 Location: Florida |
Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think we'll need Greg's expertise here. I can see a few buttons that are duplicates. I simplified all the names, and checked all the digits to make sure there were no O for zeros. I can't see anything out of the ordinary on this/
I did find it interesting that this S380 type processor had a signature that started with a 1.
EDIT:
I just realized I goofed. I had tried making a few name changes to the buttons, where the syntax looked a bit "off", but I was saving the RDF to mi IR-RDF folder, not my Remotemaster-RDF folder. Now that xnappo has made a bunch of fixes to the RDF's I probably should consolidate these to one folder. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vickyg2003 Site Admin
Joined: 20 Mar 2004 Posts: 7073 Location: Florida |
Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It appears that the "16:9" button is the culprit . Most of the other RDFs use "16-9" or "16/9" for this button. It appears that the colon is more important than the " mark when Remotemaster does the parse. _________________ Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.
Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mr_d_p_gumby Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 1370 Location: Newbury Park, CA |
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
vickyg2003 wrote: | It appears that the "16:9" button is the culprit . Most of the other RDFs use "16-9" or "16/9" for this button. It appears that the colon is more important than the " mark when Remotemaster does the parse. | The colon is used to delimit the standard button name from the actual button name, so in the case of 16:9, RM would create a"9" button and assign a standard name of "16" to it. This would probably conflict with the numeric 9 button definition elsewere in the RDF. In theory, "16:9" should be legal, but as you say, maybe the colon has precedence in this case.
As a general rule, I usually use quotes on any button name that contains non-alphanumeric characters. It does no harm to quote the button name, even if it is not required. About the only limitations I can think of are that a) multi-macro buttons cannot used quoted actual button names, and b) I don't think our tools properly handle embedded quotes within a quoted name. _________________ Mike England |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike-C
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Posts: 20
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21271 Location: Chicago, IL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|