Thanks a lot, I got the remote back to standard just by applying the IR file you linked to. I have backed it up now and got it working on my TV too.
Thanks again..
Search found 8 matches
- Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:28 pm
- Forum: JP1 - New Remotes & RDFs
- Topic: New files for 10691069 (Dreambox V5 URC-39940 R01) Remote
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20224
- Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:53 am
- Forum: JP1 - New Remotes & RDFs
- Topic: New files for 10691069 (Dreambox V5 URC-39940 R01) Remote
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20224
Totally Confused !
Hi guys, I've been playing around with IR v8 and managed to screw up my new Dreambox DM8000 V5 remote. Could you tell me please, is it possible to restore it to standard some how, maybe using the info you guyd have created here ?
I know the box itself is ok because using a V4 remote it responds ...
I know the box itself is ok because using a V4 remote it responds ...
- Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:43 am
- Forum: Code Search (Closed)
- Topic: Dreambox Remote V5 39940R01
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13717
Updated ?
hi again, I notice the RDF I got for the DM8000 remote is now showing an update of 24th April 2009. Is this the update you said you'd look at ?
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... le_id=5850
Thanks.
MCC.
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... le_id=5850
Thanks.
MCC.
- Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:51 pm
- Forum: Code Search (Closed)
- Topic: Dreambox Remote V5 39940R01
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13717
Thankyou.
Thanks for your help. Wether this updated RDF gives me what I'm looking for or not, I await you work. Thanks again...
- Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:59 pm
- Forum: Code Search (Closed)
- Topic: Dreambox Remote V5 39940R01
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13717
More info
Thanks for the reply. Here's a little more info.
As you mention, the remote only has 2 slots for devices. My V4 remote only showed the TV and Dream devices until I applied the device upgrade. It now shows the 3 devices.
So, in that respect the V5 remote is no different at the moment. I have read ...
As you mention, the remote only has 2 slots for devices. My V4 remote only showed the TV and Dream devices until I applied the device upgrade. It now shows the 3 devices.
So, in that respect the V5 remote is no different at the moment. I have read ...
- Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:40 am
- Forum: Code Search (Closed)
- Topic: Dreambox Remote V5 39940R01
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13717
DM8000
Ok, I'll try and explain.
I have my Sony TV on 0062. TV button on the remote.
I have my first Dreambox on 0031. Dream button on the remote.
I then added a device upgrade to add the AUX mode to the remote.
I setup AUX mode on 0032 to control my second Dreambox.
I added a macro Shift & Dream, to put ...
I have my Sony TV on 0062. TV button on the remote.
I have my first Dreambox on 0031. Dream button on the remote.
I then added a device upgrade to add the AUX mode to the remote.
I setup AUX mode on 0032 to control my second Dreambox.
I added a macro Shift & Dream, to put ...
- Wed Apr 22, 2009 5:04 am
- Forum: Code Search (Closed)
- Topic: Dreambox Remote V5 39940R01
- Replies: 10
- Views: 13717
Dreambox Remote V5 39940R01
1. Device: Dreambox DM8000
2. Type of device: DVB-T/C/S HD PVR Receiver.
3. Year: 2009
4. JP1/UEI Remote model: URC39940R01
5. Do you have a JP1 cable? Yes
6. Still have original remote? This is the original
7. Checked the file section? Yes
8. Checked Pronto file section (at R/C)? No
9. Partially ...
2. Type of device: DVB-T/C/S HD PVR Receiver.
3. Year: 2009
4. JP1/UEI Remote model: URC39940R01
5. Do you have a JP1 cable? Yes
6. Still have original remote? This is the original
7. Checked the file section? Yes
8. Checked Pronto file section (at R/C)? No
9. Partially ...
- Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:48 pm
- Forum: JP1 - Beginners
- Topic: URC-39940R01 and device multiplexor
- Replies: 36
- Views: 44077
DM8000 Remote
Hi there. I now have the same problem. The new Dreambox DM8000 comes with the remote URC-39940R01. I too have found the RDF file for the remote, shown as a Dreabox V5. I applied the same device upgrade I had on my previous remote which was the 39930 to add the AUX function. This seems to do nothing ...