View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21238 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 8:07 pm Post subject: Problem with IR.exe on a laptop |
|
|
I'm on the road on a business trip and I brought my old laptop with me hoping to mess around with JP1 while here, but I've run into a snag.
I'm trying to use IR 5.09 but it gets "no response from remote", same story with 4.02. I just happened to have a really old beta version of IR (2.10, I think) on this computer and that one is able to download from the remote with no problems.
What gives?
I've checked the port settings and it's the same on the new IR as it is on the old IR.
Any ideas? _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Filebug JP1 Vendor
Joined: 21 Sep 2003 Posts: 74 Location: Mechanicsburg, PA |
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try uploading a blank image with the old IR and/or do a 981 reset to the remote. _________________ -Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21238 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's not a problem with the remote, I've done many 981s on it, there's something going on with the software. I can download whenever I chose using the ancient IR, but not using the new IR.
I seem to remember that this has been brought up before, but I never paid attention to what came of the discussion as it's not my area. So hopefully someone who was involved can remember what came of it and help me out here. The ancient IR doesn't have an RDF for the URC-8811 that I'm using and I can't be bothered to make one in the old style for it. _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21238 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bump _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Pierson Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 3017 Location: Connecticut, USA |
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some people are just sooo impatient!!!
...wishing there was an FAQ to refer you to
You're using that original powered interface, correct? And you've tried all the various combinations of batteries, no batteries, etc?
Most interface problems reported are with the Simple and usually end up having to do with the resisitor values and/or diode type. The voltage mismatch tends to be more prevalent on laptops, but your powered interface shouldn't be affected by that (at least I wouldn't think so).
Is the printer port properly enabled in BIOS and the OS? Are there any special printer drivers being loaded that might interfere?
As you can probably tell, I'm just thinking out loud here... _________________ Mark |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21238 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually I'm using a regular Simple interface. I understand the problems that used to occur with the original Simple design, but in this case, the thing that's throwing me off is the fact that the old IR.exe can communicate with the remote no problem, it's just the newer versions that are having a hard time.
It happens with the old 4.02 version that I also have on this machine, so it doesn't have anything to do with the new code that Paul's added, it's obviously caused by some change that occurred somewhere between 2.10 and 4.03 _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
e34m5
Joined: 14 Oct 2003 Posts: 675 Location: Atlanta |
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Phew...At least this time I'm innocent. The only person who may know about this is Mark Pauker/........ _________________ Paul |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|