| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
semuther
Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 27
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:30 pm Post subject: Disappearing Device Number and Sub Device in Remote Master |
 |
|
I'm trying to create an upgrade file for a satellite dish position control box by copying learned data into RM from IR.
NEC1
Device 0
Sub Device 95
All the function data is in correctly but any time I try to enter the device or Sub Device numbers, they disappear when I do a file save.
Any help appreciated.
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vickyg2003
Site Admin
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 7073
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Which vesion of RM?
Which remote?
Have you tried doing this from a fresh session of RM? Sometimes, RM can get confused if I have opened multiple rdmu files in the same session prior to starting my upgrades.
Care to share your RM file?
_________________
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.
Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mdavej
Expert
Joined: 08 Oct 2003
Posts: 4501
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Known bug in RM. Workaround is to put a leading zero in the subdevice, i.e., 095. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
semuther
Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mdavej wrote: | | Known bug in RM. Workaround is to put a leading zero in the subdevice, i.e., 095. |
Didn't work. Running RM 1.98beta4. As soon as I do a FILE>SAVE the device/subdevice and parm data go away.
Remote is a URC8910(NEW)
I recently built a new PC and installed the latest versions of RM, KM and IR. Perhaps I should roll back to older versions?
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
3FG
Expert
Joined: 19 May 2009
Posts: 3367
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, 1.98beta4 is a beta. For me, the latest releasd version (1.97) works fine. I keep the the two different versions in different subdirectories, so the "rollback" consists of starting the 1.97 version instead of the 1.98 version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
semuther
Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 3FG wrote: | | Well, 1.98beta4 is a beta. For me, the latest releasd version (1.97) works fine. I keep the the two different versions in different subdirectories, so the "rollback" consists of starting the 1.97 version instead of the 1.98 version. |
Yep, just tried 1.97 and it works just fine. It's been about a year since I messed with this stuff so am a little rusty.
Thanks
Steve |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gfb107
Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Posts: 3411
Location: Cary, NC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
File Section
Wiki
