Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:05 am
by Chester
binky123 wrote:He has to take the original PB file and regenerate the protocol for the HCS08 processor. After that he may have to adjust the 2nd byte of the HCS08 protocol executor.
Yes that is what I did but the second byte in the generated protocol is 12
and Rob said to change to 15 and that works
Now will it always be the same for all generated HSC08 protocols
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 9:36 am
by The Robman
I'm guessing that the OFFSET (ie, 3) will be consistent, not the numbers themselves, so if the generated value was "15" the correct value would probably be "18", etc.
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:18 pm
by Chester
The Robman wrote:I'm guessing that the OFFSET (ie, 3) will be consistent, not the numbers themselves, so if the generated value was "15" the correct value would probably be "18", etc.
Ok If I find different I will post
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:25 pm
by mr_d_p_gumby
The Robman wrote:I'm guessing that the OFFSET (ie, 3) will be consistent, not the numbers themselves, so if the generated value was "15" the correct value would probably be "18", etc.
Yes, the bug will cause the offset to be 3 less than it should be, so adding 3 to it should be correct. It'll be fixed in the next version of PB (honest, there will be one

).