Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 10:07 am
by The Robman
Capn Trips wrote:If you're looking at THIS FILE, then the functions you seek are named "Previous Day" and "Next Day", and the EFC's are 025 and 016, respectively.
Are you sure? Those two functions are OBC 0 and 1.

With byte2 set to 1, the EFCs are 034 and 030.
With byte2 set to 2, the EFCs are 010 and 006.
With byte2 set to 3, the EFCs are 026 and 022.

EFC 025 is OBC 6 with byte2 = 3 (ie, the GUIDE button)
EFC 016 is OBC 2 with byte2 = 0 (which isn't valid)

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 10:13 am
by Capn Trips
The Robman wrote:
Capn Trips wrote:If you're looking at THIS FILE, then the functions you seek are named "Previous Day" and "Next Day", and the EFC's are 025 and 016, respectively.
Are you sure?
nope. I just glanced directly at the .txt file, not in KM, so I am most definitely wrong :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:00 am
by The Robman
Capn Trips wrote:nope. I just glanced directly at the .txt file, not in KM, so I am most definitely wrong :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
OK, I see what you were looking at now, here's the relevant snippet of the text file...

Code: Select all

fFunctions,fOBC,fByte2,bButtons,bFunctions,fNotes,Device Combiner,,kFunctions,kBoundDev,kBoundKey,kShift,b$Functions
Previous Day,000,1,0,25 - num 0,,Protocol ID,Fixed Data,,,,,
Next Day,001,1,1,16 - num 1,,,,,,,,
up arrow,002,1,2,17 - num 2,,,,,,,,
left arrow,003,1,3,18 - num 3,,,,,,,,
right arrow,004,1,4,19 - num 4,,,,,,,,
The "25" and "16" that you see are actually the button codes for the "0" and "1" buttons, which have nothing to do with the 2 functions that just happen to be located on the same lines.

If you look higher up in this file you'll see that OBC mode was used to create it, so the only codes you can read in this fashion are the OBC codes (ie, 000 and 001)

Code: Select all

Setup:,0477,99 = URC-6131 PVR,16 - PVR,OBC,USE,90 90 90,1,,,,,

Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:02 am
by gfb107
Capn Trips wrote:There has, however, been a bug identified with RM that manifests itself in that protocol (Panasonic (old)) so if you're using KM or EFC's only in RM you ought to be OK, otehrwise, wait for an RM update to work on that upgrade.
The fix for this is now available.

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 9:23 pm
by shigaloo
i jist thought i would let everyone know there are some bad codes in the this upgrade.

the fav key is actually mute, both 248

there are a few more i will post back with the full list and hopefully the correct codes (i need to borrow a remote)

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 12:59 pm
by gjarboni
shigaloo wrote:there are a few more i will post back with the full list and hopefully the correct codes (i need to borrow a remote)
Actually, it would be great if you posted a corrected upgrade to the file section. You're going to want to do that anyway and it will save others some time.

Thanks for the heads up.