Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:57 pm
by xnappo
vickyg2003 wrote: This is typical of the protocol variant issue. The older remotes don't have a MCE protocol, so we provide our smaller more efficient executor. When its built in, we want to use the built in version to save upgrade area.
.
So what does the :2 indicate? In the other conflict thread we discussed adding :UEI and then later decided against it... Is :2 already a standard we have defined?

I realize that in my thread regarding Panasonic 0042 it was a completely different protocol rather than a variation - so I am guessing the problem is similar but not the same?

Thanks for your patience while I come up to speed,
xnappo

Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:35 pm
by vickyg2003
xnappo wrote:So what does the :2 indicate? In the other conflict thread we discussed adding :UEI and then later decided against it... Is :2 already a standard we have defined?
Yes. In simplest terms it means the executor has differnt parameters