Atlas OCAP 3033 Black/Silver 1056ABC1-BXX-001-XXXX-XXX-R

General JP1 chit-chat. Developing special protocols, decoding IR signals, etc. Also a place to discuss Tips, Tricks, and How-To's.

Moderator: Moderators

xnappo
Expert
Posts: 862
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 12:29 pm

Post by xnappo »

vickyg2003 wrote: This is typical of the protocol variant issue. The older remotes don't have a MCE protocol, so we provide our smaller more efficient executor. When its built in, we want to use the built in version to save upgrade area.
.
So what does the :2 indicate? In the other conflict thread we discussed adding :UEI and then later decided against it... Is :2 already a standard we have defined?

I realize that in my thread regarding Panasonic 0042 it was a completely different protocol rather than a variation - so I am guessing the problem is similar but not the same?

Thanks for your patience while I come up to speed,
xnappo
vickyg2003
Site Admin
Posts: 7109
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by vickyg2003 »

xnappo wrote:So what does the :2 indicate? In the other conflict thread we discussed adding :UEI and then later decided against it... Is :2 already a standard we have defined?
Yes. In simplest terms it means the executor has differnt parameters
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.

Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
Post Reply