 |
JP1 Remotes
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cdhixson
Joined: 04 Aug 2003
Posts: 48
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:58 pm Post subject: RM - RC-5x protocol definition |
 |
|
I think I have figured out the protcol definition for the RC-5x protocol. Here is my entry for the ini file.
| Code: | [RC-5x]
PID=00 F2
DevParms=Device Code:5=0
DeviceTranslator=Translator(comp,0,5,3)
FixedData=1f
CmdTranslator=Translator(comp,0,8,4) Translator(comp,0,8,4)
CmdParms=OBC:7=0
DefaultCmd=ff 00
CmdIndex=1
Notes=
Code.S3C80=40 9A 12 8B 17 89 81 10 08 08 01 BB 01 A8 01 BB \
01 A8 94 01 00 00 06 7D 00 00 04 09 76 00 01 6B \
03 B6 03 20 77 77 8D 01 46
Code.740=0C 1C 12 80 0C E9 C0 20 20 08 08 02 07 02 06 03 \
78 17 5A 02 AF 5D 3C 04 77 2F 5C 3C C0 7E 22 00 \
3C A8 7E 22 00 A2 78 A0 5D 22 44 4C 03 FF
Code.6805=0C 1D 12 20 11 C0 C0 20 20 08 08 02 13 02 0A 03 \
F9 00 00 00 00 04 01 57 06 B6 5A A8 20 B7 5A A6 \
02 B7 59 A6 C0 B7 7B CD 01 83 A6 A8 B7 7B CD 01 \
83 A6 5D AE 08 CD 01 9E CD 01 8C 24 E2 81 |
I tested it against KM 7.54 and it seems to give the correct output. I only tested OBC values between 0 and 127. I don't think anything greater than 127 will work correctly. Is this a correct assumption?
The only difference is when you don't enter a device code in KM. In KM, the fixed data would be FF, while in RM it will be 1F. I don't think this makes a difference, but someone tell me if I'm wrong.
I've gotten the ball rolling so let's get some others working on these protocols. Who's next?
Chris
Last edited by cdhixson on Tue Oct 07, 2003 2:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gfb107
Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Posts: 3411
Location: Cary, NC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johnsfine
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 4766
Location: Bedford, MA
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry I don't have time to research these myself. But ...
Why does the "Translator(comp,0,8,4)" appear twice?
Why is the OBC limited to 7 bits and that translator seems to be for 8?
IIRC, regular RC5 has a bit of the obc placed oddly within the signal (not contiguous to other OBC bits). Does RC5x do that, and if so how does the protocol cover it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gfb107
Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Posts: 3411
Location: Cary, NC
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnsfine wrote: | Sorry I don't have time to research these myself. But ...
Why does the "Translator(comp,0,8,4)" appear twice?
Why is the OBC limited to 7 bits and that translator seems to be for 8?
IIRC, regular RC5 has a bit of the obc placed oddly within the signal (not contiguous to other OBC bits). Does RC5x do that, and if so how does the protocol cover it? |
Good catches, John. I should be paying more attention to the details...
_________________
-- Greg
Original RemoteMaster developer
JP1 How-To's and Software Tools
The #1 Code Search FAQ and it's answer (PLEASE READ FIRST) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jon_armstrong
Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Posts: 1238
Location: R.I.P. 3/25/2005
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FYI,
The protocol definitions of RC5 and RC5x respectively are:
{36k,msb,889}<1,-1|-1,1>(1:1,~F:1:6,T:1,D:5,F:6,^114m)+
{36k,msb,889}<1,-1|-1,1>(1:1,~F:1:6,T:1,D:5,-4,S:6,F:6,^114m)+
As John said, the top bit of the OBC in RC5 is the complement of the second data bit. I don't think I have ever seen an OBC=F >127 in RC5x but the bit structure is the same, so I think it would be safe to assume that they may.
_________________
-Jon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cdhixson
Joined: 04 Aug 2003
Posts: 48
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jon_armstrong wrote: | FYI,
The protocol definitions of RC5 and RC5x respectively are:
{36k,msb,889}<1,-1|-1,1>(1:1,~F:1:6,T:1,D:5,F:6,^114m)+
{36k,msb,889}<1,-1|-1,1>(1:1,~F:1:6,T:1,D:5,-4,S:6,F:6,^114m)+
As John said, the top bit of the OBC in RC5 is the complement of the second data bit. I don't think I have ever seen an OBC=F >127 in RC5x but the bit structure is the same, so I think it would be safe to assume that they may. |
I don't understand the protocol definition and I don't have the time to learn. I just try to match what comes out of KM. Also, things like Rc5FlagTranslator() and Rc5Translator() just appear in the protcols.ini file without a single line of documentation. I have no idea what they're doing.
Here is my second attempt.
| Code: |
[RC-5x]
PID=00 F2
DevParms=Device Code:5=0
DeviceTranslator=Translator(comp,0,5,3)
FixedData=1f
CmdTranslator=Translator(comp,0,7,5)
CmdParms=OBC:7=0
DefaultCmd=ff 00
CmdIndex=1
Notes=
Code.S3C80=40 9A 12 8B 17 89 81 10 08 08 01 BB 01 A8 01 BB \
01 A8 94 01 00 00 06 7D 00 00 04 09 76 00 01 6B \
03 B6 03 20 77 77 8D 01 46
Code.740=0C 1C 12 80 0C E9 C0 20 20 08 08 02 07 02 06 03 \
78 17 5A 02 AF 5D 3C 04 77 2F 5C 3C C0 7E 22 00 \
3C A8 7E 22 00 A2 78 A0 5D 22 44 4C 03 FF
Code.6805=0C 1D 12 20 11 C0 C0 20 20 08 08 02 13 02 0A 03 \
F9 00 00 00 00 04 01 57 06 B6 5A A8 20 B7 5A A6 \
02 B7 59 A6 C0 B7 7B CD 01 83 A6 A8 B7 7B CD 01 \
83 A6 5D AE 08 CD 01 9E CD 01 8C 24 E2 81
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
File Section
Wiki
