KM RC5/5x protocol question
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2004 12:42 pm
Hi,
I've seen a lot of discussion of this topic, but I can't seem to get it to work in KM.
I have a Philips 30PW850H TV that uses RC5 protocol from two devices, 0 and 3. Both devices have OBCs > 63. I can use the RC5 protocol to map most keys, but since there is room for only 3 device codes, I can't get in device 3 codes > 63.
I have a workaround, which is to create a second keymap and use key movers to map the device 3 codes > 63, but I would like to try the RC5/5x combo protocol.
How does one enter device codes in the dev2 column for OBCs > 63?
I've tried just entering the device code same as for OBC < 63, but those keys won't work. Adding 100 to the device code (like in the RC5 protocol) doesn't work either.
Is there a way to do this? Thanks in advance.
BTW, I have lurked on the Yahoo site and now this one forever. I built the original powered JP1 box and now use the simple interface. Sorry for being a wallflower... It always seemed that you guys were way over my head, and before now, I could always find the answer just by looking at previous posts.
Cheers, and thanks for all the wonderful work!
Mark
I've seen a lot of discussion of this topic, but I can't seem to get it to work in KM.
I have a Philips 30PW850H TV that uses RC5 protocol from two devices, 0 and 3. Both devices have OBCs > 63. I can use the RC5 protocol to map most keys, but since there is room for only 3 device codes, I can't get in device 3 codes > 63.
I have a workaround, which is to create a second keymap and use key movers to map the device 3 codes > 63, but I would like to try the RC5/5x combo protocol.
How does one enter device codes in the dev2 column for OBCs > 63?
I've tried just entering the device code same as for OBC < 63, but those keys won't work. Adding 100 to the device code (like in the RC5 protocol) doesn't work either.
Is there a way to do this? Thanks in advance.
BTW, I have lurked on the Yahoo site and now this one forever. I built the original powered JP1 box and now use the simple interface. Sorry for being a wallflower... It always seemed that you guys were way over my head, and before now, I could always find the answer just by looking at previous posts.
Cheers, and thanks for all the wonderful work!
Mark