Thanks. For my own purposes it would have been enough to have less info, and the point is well taken that just a list of models would still be worth something.mdavej wrote:Many of those details aren't as important as they were in the early days of JP1 when the chart was first conceived. I think the average person using the chart today needs to know the make/model and interface type, and signature for a kind of unique identifier. If it makes it onto the chart, we can probably say it's RM supported. Newer remotes will not be KM supported. Any remote that's not JP1 or JP1.3 probably won't be IR supported.
Extender, Phantom devices, EFC digits can all be pulled from the RDF.
I think Device Style refers to whether setup codes are manually entered using a device index (0 for cable, 1 for TV, 2 for video and 3 for audio typically) or rather using a device button (CBL, TV, etc.).
So please, if you're willing, go ahead and give it your best shot, and we'll review and try to fill in the blanks.
Back when I did it, I would download all the development RDFs and get as much info as I could out of them, then search some posts here for missing details (interface type, still made, etc.). I think some info, even just a list of models with no other details, would be better than nothing.
Thanks for doing this.
From what you have said the following would now seem to be the essentials.
Model (e.g.'15-100)
Brand (e.g.'Radio Shack')
Name (e.g.'8-in-1 Remote')
Versions (e.g. R00/R01)
Devices
Similar Model
Cable (e.g. 'JP1/3'/'OE')
Learning (y/n)
Backlight
Signature
Region
Year
edited: Newer remotes such as Xsight and URC6440 which use 'EZ-RC' http://www.ez-rc.com/Pages/LogOn/NewUse ... ation.aspx and www.simpleset.com are supplied with a USB cable, with which RMIR can now communicate. In future this might become the norm so perhaps the 'Cable' heading can be left out.
It would seem consistent with the JP1 project for the existing very large Remote Chart to be preserved, and I see that it is being viewed quite regularly. To better accommodate only new additions, perhaps I should think about adding a link to a continuation page ('dumbed down' to suit me at least
Any more comments would be appreciated.