Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:16 pm
Now I realized I did a mistake. I just checked the program and it really worked with my own sequence with some changes. The code I found had different sequence pairs and lead-in/lead-out values so I replaced them with the samples I found in Pioneer custom install website.
This is the first line from the code I found:
0000 0069 0044 0000 0155 00ac 001e 003f 001e 003f 001e 001c 001e 001c 001e 001c
This is a sample of some random code in Pioneer's website:
0000 0068 0000 0044 0168 00b4 0016 0043 0016 0016 0016 0016 0016 0016 0016 0016
As you see, the lead-in and sequence pairs are slightly different.
So I changed my code using the same frequency he used in his program and adapted the code using the same pairs and lead-in/lead-out of Pioneers.
I really don't know if all this was necessary, since I did it by trial and error, I'm not sure what exactly I did to make it work.
I'll try to replicate and keep you informed.
This is the first line from the code I found:
0000 0069 0044 0000 0155 00ac 001e 003f 001e 003f 001e 001c 001e 001c 001e 001c
This is a sample of some random code in Pioneer's website:
0000 0068 0000 0044 0168 00b4 0016 0043 0016 0016 0016 0016 0016 0016 0016 0016
As you see, the lead-in and sequence pairs are slightly different.
So I changed my code using the same frequency he used in his program and adapted the code using the same pairs and lead-in/lead-out of Pioneers.
I really don't know if all this was necessary, since I did it by trial and error, I'm not sure what exactly I did to make it work.
I'll try to replicate and keep you informed.