Buying a new remote- Home Theater master mx-500 Help
Moderator: Moderators
Buying a new remote- Home Theater master mx-500 Help
Hey gang-
I was recently surfing around looking on the Tivo forum and I came across the Home Theater Master MX-500 which apparently works well with tivo and feels pretty good.
Why do they sell the mx-500 with the 8811 jp1 remote? Is it because you can program the 8811 and then send the codes to the mx-500 via the infrared deal?
Any help is appreciated. Also how easy is it to set up macros?
Thanks
Scott
I was recently surfing around looking on the Tivo forum and I came across the Home Theater Master MX-500 which apparently works well with tivo and feels pretty good.
Why do they sell the mx-500 with the 8811 jp1 remote? Is it because you can program the 8811 and then send the codes to the mx-500 via the infrared deal?
Any help is appreciated. Also how easy is it to set up macros?
Thanks
Scott
-
Mark Pierson
- Expert
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 12:13 am
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Contact:
Since it's not a JP1 remote, the best place to get info on the MX-500 is the Home Theater Master forum at RemoteCentral.
As for the bundled 8811, it would be used to teach various commands to the MX-500, typically discretes, special command codes, etc.
As for the bundled 8811, it would be used to teach various commands to the MX-500, typically discretes, special command codes, etc.
Mark
-
The Robman
- Site Owner
- Posts: 21888
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
The MX500 is generally limited to just learning signals from your original remotes, it doesn't have the ability that most One For All remotes have to generate new signals using "advanced codes" (which are popular for creating discrete codes).
When packages with an OFA remote, you can use the OFA to generate the new signals for the MX500 to learn.
Including a JP1 cable is just taking it to the next level. If the OFA remote doesn't have the right netup code for your needs, you can't generate the new signals, which is where the JP1 cable comes into play, because it lets you add new setup codes, etc.
Once you get up to speed programming an OFA with a JP1 cable, you might find that you don't even need the MX500!
Rob
When packages with an OFA remote, you can use the OFA to generate the new signals for the MX500 to learn.
Including a JP1 cable is just taking it to the next level. If the OFA remote doesn't have the right netup code for your needs, you can't generate the new signals, which is where the JP1 cable comes into play, because it lets you add new setup codes, etc.
Once you get up to speed programming an OFA with a JP1 cable, you might find that you don't even need the MX500!
Rob
For small and easy to use, I think your best bet is a urc8011 modified for JP1 and used with a JP1 cable. I think Rob still has some modified 8011s available for sale. I think he also has modified 6011's, which are the same thing with two fewer device keys. Either is way under your price point, but I don't think you'll find anything better at that size even at a much higher price.
Neither 8011 nor 6011 have learning, so you'd need to find data on all your devices somewhere on the internet in order to program them. Between the JP1 group's files and the CCF files at RC there's data on almost all common devices. You need to be trying to control some pretty obscure stuff to really need learning.
The 8811 is like the 8011, but bigger, a few more keys, supports learning, and has the JP1 connector standard, so you just need the cable, you don't need a modification inside the remote.
Neither 8011 nor 6011 have learning, so you'd need to find data on all your devices somewhere on the internet in order to program them. Between the JP1 group's files and the CCF files at RC there's data on almost all common devices. You need to be trying to control some pretty obscure stuff to really need learning.
The 8811 is like the 8011, but bigger, a few more keys, supports learning, and has the JP1 connector standard, so you just need the cable, you don't need a modification inside the remote.
-
The Robman
- Site Owner
- Posts: 21888
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
John's right on all counts. I have modified URC-8011s available for $20 each and URC-6012s for $15 each. Shipping is $2.
Note: the URC-6012 can be made into a virtual 8 device remote with JP1.
You can get ready made JP1 cables for about $20 from either http://www.hovisdirect.com or http://jp1.filebug.com
Rob
http://www.hifi-remote.com
Note: the URC-6012 can be made into a virtual 8 device remote with JP1.
You can get ready made JP1 cables for about $20 from either http://www.hovisdirect.com or http://jp1.filebug.com
Rob
http://www.hifi-remote.com
Sorry to preëmpt Rob--I'm sure he'll answer. But I've never gone back to my TiVo remote since programming my RS-1994 to support my SVR-2000 TiVo. It does takes a certain amount of time to get used to any new remote—but you can't beat the UEI-based remotes for subtlety of control, and ease of controlling multiple devices from one location.yubayogi wrote: I started looking at the HTM-500 for its Tivo ease of use. The folks on the tivo forum said its very easy to use compared to other universal remotes. WHen I look at your web site your remotes don't look as easy to use. WHat do you think?
Haven't investigated other devices. But when one can get this much control for $20, why would I?
-
Mark Pierson
- Expert
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 12:13 am
- Location: Connecticut, USA
- Contact:
That's what JP1 is all about!!!yubayogi wrote:if what I have read is even remotely true
The 15-1994 is discontinued and very hard to find (those that have 'em don't want to give them up!).I read on remotecentral.com they are discontinued.
Many of the current models are just as capable as the venerable 1994. Some of the more popular ones are the 15-2116 (29.99 at RadioShack) and URC-8810w (19.64 at most Wal-Mart's).
Mark
My apologies if my post gave you the wrong idea. But, for instance, I am currently test-driving a URC 8810w from Wal*Mart, and it's every bit as useful with TiVo, if not better.yubayogi wrote:Knees1339 Wow if what I have read is even remotely true I have to get one of these! Where did you get yours, I read on remotecentral.com they are discontinued.
Seriously, you don't need to buy the expensive stuff.
-
The Robman
- Site Owner
- Posts: 21888
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Just FYI, the RS Kameleon is model number 15-2133.yubayogi wrote:I know this is a bit off the original subject but any word on the new Radio Shack 15-2113 aka the Kameleon?
Thanks again for all your help, I won't be spending 100's on my new remote thanks to your help.
Scott
IMHO the Kameleons are all flash, great for impressing the babysitter but not designed for the advanced user.
Go with the suggestions here and try out either the RS 15-2116 or the OFA URC-8811 (aka URC-8810w)
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
For people who don't really get the idea of a remote having device modes LCD provides feedback to help you understand what's happening.
I assume all of us with remotes with device modes sometimes press a key intending the function of that key in one device mode and it doesn't happen because the remote was left in some other device mode. If you get confused when that happens, then it may help to look at the LCD and see that the device mode isn't what you thought.
Sometimes you just forget the device mode. If the LCD were on all the time, then it could solve that. But if you forgot what device mode the remote is in, it's a good bet that the LCD has had time to turn off. Without an LCD you can just press the device key for the mode you want it to be in rather than struggle to figure out what mode it was in. I don't see how an LCD initially off can beat that simple answer.
I think the LCD just wastes space, weight and cost. Obviously some people prefer LCD, so you understand my opinion is just my opinion.
I assume all of us with remotes with device modes sometimes press a key intending the function of that key in one device mode and it doesn't happen because the remote was left in some other device mode. If you get confused when that happens, then it may help to look at the LCD and see that the device mode isn't what you thought.
Sometimes you just forget the device mode. If the LCD were on all the time, then it could solve that. But if you forgot what device mode the remote is in, it's a good bet that the LCD has had time to turn off. Without an LCD you can just press the device key for the mode you want it to be in rather than struggle to figure out what mode it was in. I don't see how an LCD initially off can beat that simple answer.
I think the LCD just wastes space, weight and cost. Obviously some people prefer LCD, so you understand my opinion is just my opinion.