Is there anything else I can do to help?3FG wrote:making a new RDF will take a little bit of time.
New Inteset / Insignia / Sanyo / Nexus JP1 remote
Candidate RDF file for the Inteset INT-422-3. Previous version of the Inteset remote have had Device Specific Macro capability, so this RDF assumes that the -3 remote can also do DSMs. This should be checked.
Here's two recent downloads from the remote using 3FG's RDF candidate.
Raw Download: http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14432
RMIR: http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14462
Thanks![/url]
Raw Download: http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14432
RMIR: http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14462
Thanks![/url]
@omgomg
I have posted here a development build 11 of RMIR v2.04 for you to test. There are two files in that package, a replacement RemoteMaster.jar file and a revised version of 3FG's RDF. This development build supports (I hope
) the new learned signal format used by your remote. I have added an entry to 3FG's RDF to select this new format, so don't try build 11 without also using this revised RDF.
I have posted here a development build 11 of RMIR v2.04 for you to test. There are two files in that package, a replacement RemoteMaster.jar file and a revised version of 3FG's RDF. This development build supports (I hope
Graham
@mathdon
Thank you! I put those files in place, and it looks like almost all of my learned signals were recognized properly. I did notice that the "Left" signal on device D (Sony DH-520 receiver) still says protocol none, but the learned signal does work on my DH-520. I've updated my RMIR save file at http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14462
Thank you! I put those files in place, and it looks like almost all of my learned signals were recognized properly. I did notice that the "Left" signal on device D (Sony DH-520 receiver) still says protocol none, but the learned signal does work on my DH-520. I've updated my RMIR save file at http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14462
omgomg,
Bear in mind that decoding an unknown IR signal is intrinsically more difficult compared to a component recognizing a signal. Your Sony only needs to decide if it can interpret an incoming learned signal, even if the durations of the on and off bursts are different to the design spec. DecodeIR.dll has to try to identify the learned signal from a large set of candidate IR protocols.
I think you'll find that if you experiment a bit using various distances between the OEM remote and the learning remote, there will be an optimal distance that gives reliable decodes. Some of us IR enthusiasts have IR widgets, which allow immediate feedback on the quality of the learn, so it is easy to see that too weak or too strong signals are a problem. Either way, the durations get recorded incorrectly. Your Sony learns should have only 4 burst pairs -- lead in, 0, 1, and lead out. Two of your learns had 18 burst pairs captured. I guess that means the remotes were too close together and the IR capturing circuit was overloaded.
Bear in mind that decoding an unknown IR signal is intrinsically more difficult compared to a component recognizing a signal. Your Sony only needs to decide if it can interpret an incoming learned signal, even if the durations of the on and off bursts are different to the design spec. DecodeIR.dll has to try to identify the learned signal from a large set of candidate IR protocols.
I think you'll find that if you experiment a bit using various distances between the OEM remote and the learning remote, there will be an optimal distance that gives reliable decodes. Some of us IR enthusiasts have IR widgets, which allow immediate feedback on the quality of the learn, so it is easy to see that too weak or too strong signals are a problem. Either way, the durations get recorded incorrectly. Your Sony learns should have only 4 burst pairs -- lead in, 0, 1, and lead out. Two of your learns had 18 burst pairs captured. I guess that means the remotes were too close together and the IR capturing circuit was overloaded.
I edited a map and image for the AOC version of this remote.
RDF:
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14510
Map
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14509
Image:
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14508
Better late than never I guess.
RDF:
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14510
Map
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14509
Image:
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=14508
Better late than never I guess.
-
unclemiltie
- Expert
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
I have several versions of this Inteset remote, and I recently bought two of the INT-422-3 version. When I try to upload my RMIR file (previously developed on my 422-1 or 422-2 remotes) to the new remote, I get an error that says "writeRemote returned -1". I've run into this same error previously when moving from the original INT-422 version to the INT-422-1 version. Is there a way to use my existing RMIR file without starting from scratch with the 422-3 remote?
I'm using RemoteMaster v2.05 build 9
I'm using RemoteMaster v2.05 build 9