I was just going to start a new thread on software distribution and came back here to check on something and I am glad I did since you made exactly the point I started to make in the new thread.Mark Pierson wrote:I know that, and I do that myself. But, is it stated in any of the readme's, etc? Will newbies know to do this?jamesgammel wrote:Could? Somehow? They can share the same rdf's(RM's)
My point is that I think we need to start streamlining the distribution of these tools. I'm always thinking about the people who aren't tech-savvy when it comes to computers. Even some of the simplest things that we take for granted need to be explicitly spelled out to others.
What we really need is an common directory structure that would be used by all these tools. Without some sort of installer app, however, I'm not sure how we could easily accomplish that.
At a minimum we could make all 3 zip files with the same folder names. Second, make a change to IR to allow a different folder for RDF's. This way we could set up a structure like a main folder of IR and sub folders of RDF, Upgrades, and Images (like RM supports). In the IR main folder would be RM, KM and IR and the sub folders are self explanatory.
I think the common directory structure is key and packaging becomes the next big question. I think IR, KM, and RM should still distribute seperately for now but RDF's and Images/Maps should be packaged seperately.
Just food for thought........