mathdon wrote:...macros not working in combo modes. I see no reason for that...
I had thought that was the norm, and assumed it might even have been determined by some technical or logical limitation. The only good reason for it might have been the global nature of macros, but note that even they were cryptic. For me, the limitation has vitiated combo mode so reckon that, especially since DSMs are now also available, to remove it would be another significant improvement.
...the shift cloaking we discussed earlier doesn't work properly on digit keys. In effect it removes one level of shift when there is nothing programmed on the shifted key. For digits this means that a double-shifted key (which would have the shift function on it if there was one) becomes a single-shifted digit (which starts the entry of a 5-digit EFC) rather than an unshifted digit (which is what one would want).
If only one press could be required to send shifted digits I guess it would go away

therefore...could that possibly be construed as another good reason to forgo, in the extender, the potential for issuing 5-digit EFCs on the fly? - after all the shifted keys themselves were not available as standard so, to many, it might not seem so much of a perversion

- or could the situation be reversed so the two presses would be needed to prepare for issuing 5-digit EFCs, with one press of shift to prepare the digit buttons for sending a shifted command, which would be more consistent with the rest?
The other issue is the delay before Power in a combo mode operates. Again, I see no reason for this.
While avoiding combo mode I hadn't noticed that, but quite agree that it would seem potentially annoying and quite unnecessary.
I guess the functions of Simple 4 were decided by marketing considerations and that it was most economical to use off-the-peg hardware and software.
Luckily that has resulted in a Ferrari engine and a Lamborghini gearbox, bolted together to make a so called "Austin 7", with much of the wiring left unattached.